- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Clinical and molecular characteristics and long-term outcomes of pediatric intracranial meningiomas: a comprehensive analysis from a single neurosurgical center
Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 13, Article number: 15 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Meningioma represents the most common intracranial tumor in adults. However, it is rare in pediatric patients. We aimed to demonstrate the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcome of pediatric meningiomas (PMs).
Method
We enrolled 74 patients with intracranial PMs and analyzed their clinicopathological characteristics. Targeted next generation sequencing was used to detect alterations in meningioma relevant genes. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between PMs and adult meningiomas (AMs). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were employed to evaluate the predictive values of clinicopathological characteristics. A nomogram was constructed and its predictive accuracy evaluated.
Result
40 females (54.1%) and 34 males (45.9%) patients, with the gender ratio of 1.18:1, were identified. 9 (12.2%) cases were clinically diagnosed as NF2-related Schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN), while 65 (87.8%) were sporadic. Ventricular location was found in 16 patients (21.6%). 19 patients (25.7%) experienced recurrence during a median follow-up period of 33 months (range 2 -145.25 months). The 3-, 5-, and 8-year PFS rates was 74.74%, 74.74%, and 59.38%, respectively. The PFS of the PM and AM cohorts were not significantly different, with or without propensity score matching. NF2 mutation was observed in 33 sporadic PMs (52.4%), whereas alterations in other genes (AKT1, TRAF7, SMO, PIK3CA, KLF4) frequently mutated in AMs, were not identified. The proportion of NF2 mutation in PMs was significantly lower in the skull base than other locations (p = 0.02). One anaplastic PM harbored TERT promoter mutation. Of note, in sporadic PMs, NF2 mutations were not significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.434) or overall survival (OS) (p = 0.60). The multivariate Cox analysis showed NF2-SWN (p < 0.001) and extent of resection (p = 0.013) to be independently associated with the PFS of PMs. Our prognostic model showed predictive accuracy for long-term PFS in PMs as the 3-, 5- and 8-year Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.927, 0.930, and 0.870, respectively.
Conclusion
PM was characterized by its relative male predominance, ventricular location, NF2-SWN, and NF2 mutation. Of note, PMs had similar prognosis to AMs and NF2 alteration was not significantly associated with PFS in PMs.
Introduction
Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor, which accounts for around 40.7% of all neoplasms in the central nervous system (CNS) [27]. According to the latest world health origination (WHO) classification of CNS tumors, meningiomas are classified into 3 grades and 15 subtypes [19]. The incidence of meningiomas increases with age [41]. Meningioma represents the most common intracranial tumor type in adult patients, while it only comprises 0.4–4.6% of the intracranial tumors in pediatric patients [15, 25, 26]. Adult meningiomas (AMs) are mostly presented as sporadic meningiomas. However, pediatric meningioma (PM) patients are commonly associated with radiation and various tumor predisposition syndromes [22, 35]. NF2-related Schwannomatosis (NF2-SWN) is the most common tumor predisposition syndrome found in PM patients. In PM patients with NF2-SWN, their tumors often show a more aggressive biological behavior [35, 36].
Meningioma is a highly heterogenous disease. Previous studies have demonstrated that PMs and AMs show distinct clinical characteristics [28, 29, 34]. It was reported that the gender distribution and the spectrum of histological variants are different between PMs and AMs [29]. In recent years, our knowledge on the molecular alterations in AMs has increased substantially. NF2 mutations were identified in around 60% sporadic meningiomas, which is associated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in all grades [30, 44]. More recently, SMO, KLF4, TRAF7, AKT1, and PIK3CA alterations have been identified in non-NF2 mutant meningiomas, and are associated with different clinical characteristics [1, 6, 44]. For PMs, recent studies reported that NF2 mutations are also the most common alteration. However, other typical alterations found in AMs were absent [3, 14, 16]. Recently, YAP1 fusions were identified in non-NF2 PMs [37]. Kirches et al. [14] found loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 22 in 76% of PMs. They separated PM patients into three groups with different clinical characteristics and compared them with AM patients, showing that PM patients largely grouped separately.
Thus, meningiomas in different age groups display notable variations in clinicopathological characteristics and molecular alterations. However, the prognostic difference between PMs and AMs is unclear. Nowadays, models for the prediction of recurrence and survival status of AMs are rapidly increasing, while there has been no prognostic analysis of large cohorts and corresponding prediction models for PMs. In this study, we comprehensively demonstrated the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics as well as long-term outcome of PMs in a single neurosurgical center. A prognostic model with excellent performance was also constructed for the prediction of progression-free rates in PMs.
Materials and methods
Patient population and follow-up
The study cohort included 74 consecutive pediatric patients (age ≤ 20) with intracranial meningiomas managed in our center from 2010 to 2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Pathological diagnosis of meningioma, 2) Complete clinical and follow-up information. Patients were followed up through outpatient services and phone communication after their operations. Postoperative complications, treatment and recurrent status were recorded. Patients lost to follow-up within the first year were excluded. Additionally, another 562 adult patients with intracranial meningiomas who underwent tumor resection in our hospital with complete follow-up information during the same period were also included for prognostic comparisons with PMs. This cohort consisted of 209 (37.2%) grade 1 meningiomas, 305 (54.3%) grade 2 meningiomas, and 48 (8.5%) WHO grade 3 meningiomas who has been regularly followed up in our center. These patients had standardized follow-up in our previously published study and were not consecutive [31, 32]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between surgery and tumor recurrence or progression, censored at the last follow-up visit or in the event of patient deaths from causes other than meningiomas.
Clinical characteristics collection and pathological review
Clinical characteristics, including age at diagnosis, gender, systematic syndromes (mainly NF2-SWN), surgical history, and tumor location, were retrieved from the medical record. Simpson grades were extracted from the surgical record and confirmed by postoperative MRI. Extent of resection (EOR) was classified into gross-total resection (GTR, Simpson grades I–III) and subtotal resection (STR, Simpson grade IV-V). Tumor location was categorized as convexity, parasagittal, skull base, and ventricular. All the formalin-fixed tumor samples of patients were reviewed by two experienced pathologists (HX.C. and H.C.). Histopathological diagnosis was made according to the 2021 WHO Classification of the Central Nervous System Tumours. Immunohistochemical reviews, including Ki-67 index and progesterone receptor (PR), were performed as well.
Cohort matching
For the accuracy of prognostic comparisons between PMs and AMs, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the possible confounding bias that was caused by variables such as gender, tumor location, WHO grade, EOR, and postoperative radiotherapy [4]. The propensity score was calculated via logistic regression. We employed a 1:1 ratio to match patients in the PM and AM cohorts, and evaluated the quality of the match by considering p-value and absolute standardized difference (ASD). A successful match was defined as having p > 0.05 or ASD < 0.2.
Targeted sequencing
We utilized a custom-designed meningioma specified Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel to detect gene mutations in PMs [13]. The targeted NGS panel contained 184 genes reported to be frequently mutated in CNS tumors, including common pathological genes relevant in meningiomas as described previously, including NF2, TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, SMO, PIK3CA, SMARCE1, BAP1, CDKN2A/B, TERT-P, ARIDIA, SUFU, SMARCB1, POLR2A, DMD, and PBRM1. The procedure of targeted sequencing was described previously [33].
Prognostic model construction
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes, aiming to identify independent predictors of tumor recurrence. Firstly, all clinicopathological characteristics were applied for univariate analysis. Secondly, the variables whose p-value being lower than 0.05 were evaluated via multivariate Cox analysis. Thirdly, the model was constructed by the backward step-down selection process with Akaike information criterion [9]. Finally, a nomogram for 3-, 5-, 8-year progression-free rate was created based on the model.
Statistical analysis
R software (Version 3.4.2) was used for statistical analysis. The R packages used for plotting and comparisons in the study included “survival, survminer, ggplot2, ggpubr, pheatmap, survivalROC, plotROC, regplot, survcomp, foreign, and tidyverse”. PSM was performed using the R packages including “pacman, wakefield, knitr, and MatchIt”. Continuous and categorical variables were compared through Student’s t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Maximally selected rank statistics was applied to determine the optimal cut-off for age at diagnosis and Ki-67 index. PFS was evaluated through Kaplan–Meier method and compared through the long-rank test. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinicopathological characteristics of PMs
In the PM cohort, 40 female (54.1%) and 34 male (45.9%) patients were identified, resulting in a gender ratio of 1.18:1. The mean age at diagnosis was 15.7 ± 4.33 years old (range: 2–20). 9 cases (12.2%) were diagnosed with NF2-SWN, while 65 (87.8%) were sporadic. 61 (82.4%) were de novo (newly diagnosed), while 13 (17.6%) were recurrent (with history of prior surgery). The most common tumor location was the convexity (n = 29, 39.2%, 20 frontal, 5 parietal, 2 temporal, and 2 occipital), followed by skull base (n = 23, 31.1%; 6 sphenoid ridge, 6 cerebellopontine angle, 4 sellar region, 3 petrous ridge, 2 foramen magnum, and 2 cerebellum,), ventricular (n = 16, 21.6%; 14 lateral ventricle and 2 fourth ventricle) and parasagittal (n = 6, 8.11%). Five cases with NF2 disease had multiple meningiomas. All the tumors received surgical removal; 56 patients (75.7%) underwent GTR, while 18 patients (24.3%) underwent STR. For meningiomas with STR, 14 (77.78%) were skull base or parasagittal located. Pathological review results showed that 61 tumors (82.4%) were diagnosed as WHO grade 1, 12 (16.2%) as WHO grade 2, and 1 (1.35%) as WHO grade 3 (anaplastic subtype). Immunohistochemical findings indicated that PR expression was positive in 29 patients (39.2%), negative in 26 patients (35.1%), and weakly positive in 19 patients (25.7%). The median Ki-67 index was 3% (range: 1–25%) (Table 1). Based on maximally selected rank statistics, the optimal cut-off of age at diagnosis and Ki-67 index were determined as 10 years old (See Additional Fig. 1A) and 2% (See Additional Fig. 1B), respectively.
Distribution of propensity scores and Kaplan–Meier survival curves of matched cohorts. A: Distribution of the matched samples in the PM (Treated Units) and AM (Control Units) cohorts. B: Distribution of propensity scores in the PM (Treated) and AM (Control) cohorts. C: Kaplan–Meier survival curves for PFS between the PM and AM cohorts before PSM. D: Kaplan–Meier survival curves for PFS between the PM and AM cohorts after PSM of the latter
Follow-up outcomes
The last follow-up was conducted on November 30, 2023, with a median follow-up period of 33 months (range 2 -145.25 months). In our cohort, postoperative radiotherapy indications in this study followed the EANO guidelines [10, 11]. Radiotherapy was recommended for WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas, while stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was suggested for subtotal resection tumors. The ultimate decision to proceed with radiotherapy rested with the patient. Among the PM patients, 13 (17.6%) received postoperative radiotherapy within 2–3 months after surgery. Of them, 10 (76.9%) patients with high grade meningioma received fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with a mean dose of 42.5 ± 2.8 Gy (range: 15-45 Gy), and 3 (23.1%) patients with subtotal resected meningioma underwent stereotactic radiotherapy (Gamma Knife) with a mean dose of 13.2 ± 1.3 Gy (range: 12-16 Gy). During the follow-up period, 19 patients (25.7%) experienced recurrence, and 3 (4.1%) died of tumor progression. Analysis of the association of clinico-pathological parameters with recurrence revealed significant difference in NF2-SWN (p < 0.001), surgical history (p = 0.003), EOR (p = 0.012), and WHO grade (p = 0.023) between recurrent and stable patients. Patients who developed recurrence demonstrated a higher prevalence of NF2 disease and surgical history. Additionally, the proportion of STR and high-grade tumors was higher in the recurrence group than the non-recurrence group (Table 1). The survival analysis showed the median PFS of PMs was unavailable, and the 3-, 5-, and 8-year progression-free rate was 74.74%, 74.74%, and 59.38%, respectively. The median OS was unavailable, and the 3-, 5-, and 8-year survival rate was 97.15%, 97.15%, and 93.56%, respectively.
Clinical characteristics and outcome of the AM cohort
The AM cohort included 209 grade 1 (37.2%), 305 grade 2 (54.3%) and 48 grade 3 (8.5%) meningiomas, which were followed regularly at our center during the same period as PMs. In this cohort, 325 females (57.8%) and 237 males (42.2%) were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 53.8 ± 12.3 years old. The most common tumor location was convexity (248, 44.1%), followed by skull base (171, 30.4%), parasagittal (127, 22.6%) and ventricular (16, 2.8%). STR was achieved in 75 patients (13.3%). 206 patients (54.8%) received postoperative radiotherapy. During the median follow-up of 65.5 months, 146 patients (26.0%) experienced tumor recurrence or progression. Prior to PSM, significant difference was observed in tumor location (p < 0.001), EOR (p = 0.019), radiotherapy (p < 0.001), and WHO grade (p < 0.001) between the PM and AM cohorts (Table 2).
Prognostic comparisons between PMs and AMs
PSM was conducted to minimize the influence of covariates between the PM and AM cohorts. Following the matching at a 1:1 ratio, 74 AM patients were selected to analyze prognostic differences with PMs (Fig. 1A). The propensity score of the matched AM cohort closely resembled that of the PM cohort (Fig. 1B). Differences in tumor location (p = 0.794), EOR (p = 1.000), radiotherapy (p = 0.218), and WHO grade (p = 0.834) were effectively minimized between the two cohorts. The results of ASDs also affirmed the well-balanced nature of differences between the two cohorts (Table 2). Kaplan–Meier analysis was employed to compare the prognostic differences between PMs and AMs. Prior to PSM, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two cohorts (p = 0.26) (Fig. 1C). Following PSM, the matched cohorts did not show a significant difference in PFS, either (p = 0.2) (Fig. 1D).
Prognostic factors for PFS in PMs
Univariate Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the predictive value of clinicopathological characteristics, including age at diagnosis, gender, tumor location, EOR, WHO grade, Ki-67, PR, and postoperative radiotherapy. The univariate analysis showed that WHO grade (p = 0.003), NF2-SWN (p < 0.001), surgical history (p = 0.002), EOR (p = 0.031), Ki-67 index (p = 0.036) were significantly associated with PFS (Fig. 2A). Specifically, GTR (Fig. 2B), low WHO grade (Fig. 2C), Ki-67 < 2% (Fig. 2D), no NF2-SWN (Fig. 2E), and no surgical history (Fig. 2F) were associated with significantly prolonged PFS. However, postoperative radiotherapy did not significantly prolong the PFS in our PM cohort (Fig. 3A). The Pearson Correlation Test indicated that the correlation coefficients between the 5 variables, i.e., WHO grade, NF2-SWN, surgical history, EOR, and Ki-67 index, identified with our Univariate Cox regression analysis, were below 0.3, suggesting their independence (Fig. 3B). Subsequently, we performed a multivariate Cox regression analysis of these factors, and demonstrated that NF2-SWN (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 16.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) (5.05–53.55)) and EOR (p = 0.013, HR = 3.67, 95% CI (1.32–10.22)) were independent prognostic factors for the PFS of PM patients (Fig. 3C).
The univariate Cox analysis of clinicopathological factors. A: The forest plot of univariate Cox analysis result. B: The Kaplan–Meier curves of EOR. C: The Kaplan–Meier curves of WHO grade. D: The Kaplan–Meier curves of Ki-67 index. E: The Kaplan–Meier curves of NF2-SWN. F: The Kaplan–Meier curves of surgical history
Molecular alterations in PMs
To understand genetic alterations in PMs and their potential impact on prognosis, we performed targeted gene sequencing in 63 of 65 patients with sporadic PMs (Two samples failed the quality inspection). The results showed that 33 tumors (52.38%) had NF2 mutations and 1 anaplastic tumor (1.59%) had TERT promoter mutation. However, mutations in other meningioma-associated genes such as AKT1, KLF4, and TRAF7 were not found in PMs (See Additional Table 1). We further analyzed the correlation between NF2 mutations and clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in gender (p = 0.40) and WHO grade (p = 0.26) between NF2 wild-type and NF2 mutant sporadic PMs (Fig. 4A). 17 of 25 (68.0%) sporadic PMs located in convexity harbored NF2 mutations, whereas only 4 of 18 (22.2%) PMs located in skull base harbored NF2 mutations. Statistical analysis revealed that NF2 mutations were significantly predominant in non-skull base tumors (Fig. 4B, p = 0.02). We found 11 patients (11/14, 78.6%) with ventricular PMs were female and 7 (63.6%) of them had NF2 mutations (Fig. 4B). Unexpectedly, the recurrence rate of patients with NF2 mutations (18.2%) was similar to that of NF2 wild-type (13.3%) (Fig. 4C, p = 0.74). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that NF2 mutation status was not associated with PFS (Fig. 4D, p = 0.43) or OS (Fig. 4E, p = 0.60) in sporadic PMs.
Genomic analysis and impact of NF2 status on survival. A: Genomic mutation and relevant clinical characteristics of PM patients. B: the number of NF2 mutation in different tumor location. C: the recurrence rate comparison between NF2 wild-type and mutant PM patients. D: The Kaplan–Meier curves of NF2 mutation for PFS. E: The Kaplan–Meier curves of NF2 mutation for OS
Construction of a nomogram for prediction of recurrence in PM patients
To assist identification of high-risk PM patients prone to recurrence in clinical practice, we developed a prognostic model by the backward step-down selection process in multivariate Cox analysis. The 3-, 5- and 8-year Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the model was 0.927, 0.930, 0.870, respectively (Fig. 5A), indicating its superior predictive accuracy for long-term PFS. The risk score of the prognostic model was calculated as follows: risk score = 0.9033 * grade + 2.9232 * NF2-SWN + 0.7719 * surgical history + 1.4083 * EOR. Utilizing maximally selected rank statistics, we determined the optimal cutoffs of the risk score as 3.45. Based on this cut-off, PM patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups, displaying a striking significant difference in PFS (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, we constructed a nomogram based on the model to predict the progression-free rates of PM patients at 3, 5, and 8 years following surgical intervention (Fig. 5C). The calibration curve demonstrated great agreement between observation and prediction of PFS (Fig. 5D). The 3-year (See Additional Fig. 2A), 5-year (See Additional Fig. 2B), and 8-year (See Additional Fig. 2C) decision curve analysis underscored the nomogram as a very effective tool for predicting the likelihood of tumor recurrence. This predictive tool for long-term prognosis can guide physicians to personalized management strategies to optimize long-term outcomes.
The prediction performance of the prognostic model. A: The time-independent ROC curves and AUC values of the prognostic model. B: The Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS of the high and low risk groups divided by the cut-off 3.45. C: The nomogram to predict the 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year PFS rate of PM patients. Red shows an example for a total point calculation. D: The calibration curved of the nomogram
Discussion
Our PM cohort was comprised of 40 females (54.1%) and 34 males (45.9%), with the gender ratio of 1.18:1. Similar to prior studies, female predominance was very modest among PMs as opposed to AMs that show a clearer female predominance [17, 35]. A recent review reported PMs with a male-to-female ratio of 40:60 [24]. This discrepancy may be attributed to hormonal influences, specifically progesterone and estrogen, which play a role in modulating the growth of a significant proportion of meningiomas. The variation in sex distribution between AM and PM patients could be attributed to differences in sex hormone levels between these two populations [20].
In our PM cohort, 9 individuals (12.2%) were diagnosed with NF2-SWN, while 65 (87.8%) were sporadic cases. Previous studies indicate that PMs often show associations with NF2-SWN and other tumor predisposition syndromes. NF2-SWN was frequently reported in PMs where the incidence ranged widely from 3.7 to 50% [17, 22, 35, 40]. A literature review involving 99 patients from 32 different authors indicated that 13% of PM patients (13 out of 99) had a prior diagnosis of NF2-SWN, highlighting a significant co-occurrence of NF2-SWN in PM patients [24]. The prevalence of NF2 distinguishes pediatric patients from their adult counterparts, which may contribute to the uncertainty surrounding the biological behavior and treatment guidelines in PMs [39]. Notably, ventricular tumors accounted for 21.6% (16/74) of PMs in our study. Previous studies reported that intraventricular meningiomas are relatively common in pediatric cases, particularly in the lateral ventricle, compared with relative rarity of adult intraventricular meningiomas [22, 24, 38]. Opoku et al. [24] found that ventricular meningiomas represented 50% of their PM patients. In contrast, a series involving 675 AM patients reported that intraventricular meningiomas comprised only 3.7% of the cases [18].
Our targeted DNA sequencing of sporadic PMs revealed that 33 patients harbored NF2 mutations and 1 patient harbored TERTp mutation, while other typical mutations involving AKT1, KLF4, TRAF7 were absent. These findings were consistent with previous studies [3, 14]. Perry et al. [29] conducted a detailed analysis of NF2 mutations in PM patients, finding mutations in 86% of those with NF2-SWN and 70% in those without NF2-SWN, which aligns with our findings. However, Kirches et al. [14] found NF2 mutation in only 24% PM patients. We attribute this proportion difference primarily to the varying distribution of WHO grades. In Kirches’ cohort, 30% of tumors were grade 1, 57% were grade 2, and 14% were grade 3 meningiomas. In contrast, our cohort comprised 82.4% grade 1, 16.2% grade 2, and 1.4% grade 3 meningiomas. To investigate further, we reviewed the recent literature review by Arnault et al. [40], which included 56 studies and 498 cases of PMs. This reported that 67% of tumors were grade I, 23% were grade II, and 10% were grade III, a distribution more similar to our cohort. In addition, the proportion of NF2 mutations in non-skull base PMs was significantly higher than that in skull base PMs, which is similar to the genetic mutation characteristics of AMs [6]. Notably, our survival analysis showed NF2 mutation was not a significant factor affecting PFS of PMs, unlike the results found in AMs [45]. Recently, YAP1 fusions was reported in some non-NF2 PMs [37]. YAP1 is a transcriptional coactivator of the HIPPO pathway and acts downstream of the HIPPO pathway through the TEAD family transcription factors [47, 48]. The NF2 gene product merlin protein acts upstream of the HIPPO pathway [46]. YAP1 fusion and NF2 mutation are mutually exclusive, so Sievers P et al. [37] speculated that YAP1 fusion could be an alternative to NF2 mutation. In addition, increasing evidence suggests the functional relationship between YAP1, NF2, and HIPPO pathway activation [2]. YAP1 fusions, which our target sequencing method was unable to detect, may contribute to the similar prognosis found in NF2 mutant and wild-type PMs, since no other typical mutations were detected in non-NF2 PMs.
In this study, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the PM and AM cohorts, even after PSM. Previous studies indicated that the prognosis for PMs remains favorable despite aggressive characteristics. Rochat et al. [34] followed up PM patients for a long period and found that 20 out of 22 meningiomas were benign. Remarkably, two patients diagnosed with anaplastic meningiomas were still alive after 17- and 18-year-follow-ups. Dudley et al. [8] also found that PM patients had similar outcomes and were treated identically to AM patients. Our multivariate Cox analysis showed that NF2-SWN (p < 0.001) and EOR (p = 0.013) were independently associated with the PFS of PM patients. In PM patients with NF2-SWN, their tumors often show a more aggressive biological behavior, a tendency to grow rapidly, a higher likelihood of recurrence shortly after initial treatment, and an inclination towards malignancy [35, 36]. These biological characteristics contribute to an overall unfavorable prognosis [36]. A meta-analysis involving 677 patients with meningiomas indicated that patients with NF2-SWN experienced a worse PFS compared to those without NF2-SWN [16]. Therefore, PM patients with NF2-SWN face a heightened risk of developing progressive and recurrent tumors, necessitating an extended postoperative follow-up period [5, 7]. Additionally, previous studies demonstrated that surgical intervention is the preferred treatment for PM patients and the EOR plays a crucial role in influencing the recurrence of tumors [42].
PMs are a heterogeneous group of tumors. It is crucial to identify meningiomas with high risk of recurrence to implement early intervention. In this study, we constructed a prognostic model with the 3-, 5- and 8-year AUC of 0.927, 0.930, 0.870, respectively. This is the first model for the prediction of PM recurrence with excellent performance. For pediatric patients experiencing recurrence, opting for a second-look surgery proves more effective than resorting to radiotherapy. Prior research has emphasized the recommendation of radiotherapy exclusively in cases of recurrence, high-grade tumors, or when surgical accessibility is limited [5, 23, 43]. Grade 2 meningiomas in children may undergo radiotherapy upon reaching 8 years of age. For WHO Grade 3 meningiomas, fractionated radiotherapy is advised for children aged 3 years and older [12, 23]. In instances of inaccessible tumors or histologically aggressive neoplasms, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) presents a viable alternative. Notably, Horiba et al. [12] highlighted the feasibility of SRS in a 2-year-old patient. Minniti et al. [21] reported a significant intracranial tumor control rate, ranging from 85 to 97%, at the 5-year follow-up after SRS.
Conclusion
PMs are characterized by their atypicality of relative male predominance, ventricular location, NF2-SWN and NF2 mutation. Of note, PMs had similar outcome to AMs and there was no significant association between NF2 mutation status and PFS in PMs.
Limitation
Firstly, selection bias and recall bias may exist due to the retrospective nature of the study. Secondly, some patients were lost during the long-term follow-up period. Thirdly, molecular genomic data was only available for the genes known to be relevant in CNS tumors such as NF2, AKT1, KLF4, TRAF7, TERT, and CDKN2A/B. Whole-exome sequencing should be performed in PMs and may detect novel driver mutations in future studies. Finally, the nomogram developed was based on a limited sample size and remains unvalidated. Future studies are needed to validate it and enhance its applicability.
Availability of data and materials
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Abbreviations
- AM:
-
Adult meningioma
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- ASD:
-
Absolute standardized difference
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- EOR:
-
Extent of resection
- GTR:
-
Gross-total resection
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- NF2-SWN:
-
NF2-related Schwannomatosis
- NGS:
-
Next Generation Sequencing
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PM:
-
Pediatric meningioma
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
- PR:
-
Progesterone receptor
- PSM:
-
Propensity score matching
- STR:
-
Subtotal resection
- WHO:
-
World health origination
References
Abedalthagafi M, Bi WL, Aizer AA, Merrill PH, Brewster R, Agarwalla PK, Listewnik ML, Dias-Santagata D, Thorner AR, Van Hummelen P et al (2016) Oncogenic PI3K mutations are as common as AKT1 and SMO mutations in meningioma. Neuro Oncol 18:649–655. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/nov316
Baia GS, Caballero OL, Orr BA, Lal A, Ho JS, Cowdrey C, Tihan T, Mawrin C, Riggins GJ (2012) Yes-associated protein 1 is activated and functions as an oncogene in meningiomas. Mol Cancer Res 10:904–913. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0116
Battu S, Kumar A, Pathak P, Purkait S, Dhawan L, Sharma MC, Suri A, Singh M, Sarkar C, Suri V (2018) Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of pediatric meningiomas. Neuropathology 38:22–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/neup.12426
Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, Blackstone EH (2018) Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 53:1112–1117. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ejcts/ezy167
Blakeley JO, Evans DG, Adler J, Brackmann D, Chen R, Ferner RE, Hanemann CO, Harris G, Huson SM, Jacob A et al (2012) Consensus recommendations for current treatments and accelerating clinical trials for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. Am J Med Genet A 158A:24–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/ajmg.a.34359
Clark VE, Erson-Omay EZ, Serin A, Yin J, Cotney J, Ozduman K, Avsar T, Li J, Murray PB, Henegariu O et al (2013) Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339:1077–1080. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/science.1233009
Dirks MS, Butman JA, Kim HJ, Wu T, Morgan K, Tran AP, Lonser RR, Asthagiri AR (2012) Long-term natural history of neurofibromatosis Type 2-associated intracranial tumors. J Neurosurg 117:109–117. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3171/2012.3.JNS111649
Dudley RWR, Torok MR, Randall S, Beland B, Handler MH, Mulcahy-Levy JM, Liu AK, Hankinson TC (2018) Pediatric versus adult meningioma: comparison of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. J Neurooncol 137:621–629. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11060-018-2756-1
Glatting G, Kletting P, Reske SN, Hohl K, Ring C (2007) Choosing the optimal fit function: comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F-test. Med Phys 34:4285–4292. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1118/1.2794176
Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, Jenkinson MD, Sallabanda K, Houdart E, von Deimling A, Stavrinou P, Lefranc F, Lund-Johansen M et al (2016) EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 17:e383-391. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30321-7
Goldbrunner R, Stavrinou P, Jenkinson MD, Sahm F, Mawrin C, Weber DC, Preusser M, Minniti G, Lund-Johansen M, Lefranc F et al (2021) EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 23:1821–1834. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/noab150
Horiba A, Hayashi M, Tamura N, Chiba K, Aihara Y, Kawamata T (2018) Gamma Knife treatment of malignant infantile brain tumors - Case report. J Radiosurg SBRT 5:249–253
Hua L, Alkhatib M, Podlesek D, Günther L, Pinzer T, Meinhardt M, Zeugner S, Herold S, Cahill DP, Brastianos PK et al (2022) Two predominant molecular subtypes of spinal meningioma: thoracic NF2-mutant tumors strongly associated with female sex, and cervical AKT1-mutant tumors originating ventral to the spinal cord. Acta Neuropathol. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00401-022-02474-9
Kirches E, Sahm F, Korshunov A, Bluecher C, Waldt N, Kropf S, Schrimpf D, Sievers P, Stichel D, Schuller U et al (2021) Molecular profiling of pediatric meningiomas shows tumor characteristics distinct from adult meningiomas. Acta Neuropathol 142:873–886. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00401-021-02351-x
Kotecha RS, Junckerstorff RC, Lee S, Cole CH, Gottardo NG (2011) Pediatric meningioma: current approaches and future direction. J Neurooncol 104:1–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11060-010-0503-3
Kotecha RS, Pascoe EM, Rushing EJ, Rorke-Adams LB, Zwerdling T, Gao X, Li X, Greene S, Amirjamshidi A, Kim SK et al (2011) Meningiomas in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 12:1229–1239. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70275-3
Lakhdar F, Arkha Y, El Ouahabi A, Melhaoui A, Rifi L, Derraz S, El Khamlichi A (2010) Intracranial meningioma in children: different from adult forms? A series of 21 cases. Neurochirurgie 56:309–314. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.neuchi.2010.05.008
Liu M, Wei Y, Liu Y, Zhu S, Li X (2006) Intraventricular meninigiomas: a report of 25 cases. Neurosurg Rev 29:36–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10143-005-0418-1
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins C, Ng HK, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/noab106
Mehta N, Bhagwati S, Parulekar G (2009) Meningiomas in children: A study of 18 cases. J Pediatr Neurosci 4:61–65. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4103/1817-1745.57322
Minniti G, Amichetti M, Enrici RM (2009) Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas. Radiat Oncol 4:42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1748-717X-4-42
Muley KD, Shaikh ST, Deopujari CE, Andar UB (2017) Primary intraventricular meningiomas in children-experience of two cases with review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst 33:1589–1594. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00381-017-3483-1
Norden AD, Drappatz J, Wen PY (2009) Advances in meningioma therapy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9:231–240. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11910-009-0034-5
Opoku I, Yang L, Sun P, Zhou M, Liu Y, Ren J, Du J, Feng L, Zeng G (2022) Pediatric cerebral meningioma: a single-center study with 10 children not associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg 57:422–433. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1159/000526541
Ostrom QT, de Blank PM, Kruchko C, Petersen CM, Liao P, Finlay JL, Stearns DS, Wolff JE, Wolinsky Y, Letterio JJ et al (2015) Alex’s lemonade stand foundation infant and childhood primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the united states in 2007–2011. Neuro Oncol 16(Suppl 10):x1–x36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/nou327
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, de Blank PM, Finlay JL, Gurney JG, McKean-Cowdin R, Stearns DS, Wolff JE, Liu M, Wolinsky Y et al (2016) American brain tumor association adolescent and young adult primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the united states in 2008–2012. Neuro Oncol 18(Suppl 1):i1–i50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/nov297
Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, Cioffi G, Waite KA, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2023) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the united states in 2016–2020. Neuro Oncol 25:iv1–iv99. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/noad149
Perry A, Dehner LP (2003) Meningeal tumors of childhood and infancy. An update and literature review. Brain Pathol 13:386–408. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2003.tb00038.x
Perry A, Giannini C, Raghavan R, Scheithauer BW, Banerjee R, Margraf L, Bowers DC, Lytle RA, Newsham IF, Gutmann DH (2001) Aggressive phenotypic and genotypic features in pediatric and NF2-associated meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 53 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 60:994–1003. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jnen/60.10.994
Peyre M, Kalamarides M (2018) Molecular genetics of meningiomas: Building the roadmap towards personalized therapy. Neurochirurgie 64:22–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.06.007
Ren L, Hua L, Bao Z, Deng J, Wang D, Chen J, Chen H, Juratli TA, Wakimoto H, Gong Y (2023) Distinct clinical outcome of microcystic meningioma as a WHO grade 1 meningioma subtype. J Neurooncol 161:193–202. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11060-022-04034-3
Ren L, Hua L, Deng J, Cheng H, Wang D, Chen J, Xie Q, Wakimoto H, Gong Y (2023) Favorable long-term outcomes of chordoid meningioma compared with the other WHO Grade 2 meningioma subtypes. Neurosurgery 92:745–755. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1227/neu.0000000000002272
Ren L, Xie Q, Deng J, Chen J, Yu J, Wang D, Wakimoto H, Gong Y, Hua L (2024) Association of frequent NF2 mutations with spinal location predominance and worse outcomes in psammomatous meningiomas. J Neurosurg. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3171/2024.1.JNS232450
Rochat P, Johannesen HH, Gjerris F (2004) Long-term follow up of children with meningiomas in Denmark: 1935 to 1984. J Neurosurg 100:179–182. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0179
Santos MV, Furlanetti L, Valera ET, Brassesco MS, Tone LG, de Oliveira RS (2012) Pediatric meningiomas: a single-center experience with 15 consecutive cases and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1887–1896. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00381-012-1823-8
Sheikh BY, Siqueira E, Dayel F (1996) Meningioma in children: a report of nine cases and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol 45:328–335. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00451-3
Sievers P, Chiang J, Schrimpf D, Stichel D, Paramasivam N, Sill M, Gayden T, Casalini B, Reuss DE, Dalton J et al (2020) YAP1-fusions in pediatric NF2-wildtype meningioma. Acta Neuropathol 139:215–218. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00401-019-02095-9
Song KS, Park SH, Cho BK, Wang KC, Phi JH, Kim SK (2008) Third ventricular chordoid meningioma in a child. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:269–272. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3171/PED.2008.2.10.269
Stanuszek A, Piatek P, Kwiatkowski S, Adamek D (2014) Multiple faces of children and juvenile meningiomas: a report of single-center experience and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 118:69–75. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.019
Tauziede-Espariat A, Pfister SM, Mawrin C, Sahm F (2023) Pediatric meningiomas: A literature review and diagnostic update. Neurooncol Adv 5:i105–i111. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/noajnl/vdac165
Thuijs NB, Uitdehaag BM, Van Ouwerkerk WJ, van der Valk P, Vandertop WP, Peerdeman SM (2012) Pediatric meningiomas in The Netherlands 1974–2010: a descriptive epidemiological case study. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1009–1015. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00381-012-1759-z
Traunecker H, Mallucci C, Grundy R, Pizer B, Saran F, Children’s C, Leukaemia G (2008) Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG): guidelines for the management of intracranial meningioma in children and young people. Br J Neurosurg 22:13–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/02688690701842208
Wen PY, Quant E, Drappatz J, Beroukhim R, Norden AD (2010) Medical therapies for meningiomas. J Neurooncol 99:365–378. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11060-010-0349-8
Youngblood MW, Duran D, Montejo JD, Li C, Omay SB, Ozduman K, Sheth AH, Zhao AY, Tyrtova E, Miyagishima DF et al (2019) Correlations between genomic subgroup and clinical features in a cohort of more than 3000 meningiomas. J Neurosurg. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3171/2019.8.JNS191266
Youngblood MW, Miyagishima DF, Jin L, Gupte T, Li C, Duran D, Montejo JD, Zhao A, Sheth A, Tyrtova E et al (2021) Associations of meningioma molecular subgroup and tumor recurrence. Neuro Oncol 23:783–794. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/noaa226
Zhang N, Bai H, David KK, Dong J, Zheng Y, Cai J, Giovannini M, Liu P, Anders RA, Pan D (2010) The Merlin/NF2 tumor suppressor functions through the YAP oncoprotein to regulate tissue homeostasis in mammals. Dev Cell 19:27–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015
Zhao B, Wei X, Li W, Udan RS, Yang Q, Kim J, Xie J, Ikenoue T, Yu J, Li L et al (2007) Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. Genes Dev 21:2747–2761. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gad.1602907
Zhao B, Ye X, Yu J, Li L, Li W, Li S, Yu J, Lin JD, Wang CY, Chinnaiyan AM et al (2008) TEAD mediates YAP-dependent gene induction and growth control. Genes Dev 22:1962–1971. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gad.1664408
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the Doctor Lingyang Hua, Professor Ye gong and Doctor Jiaojiao Deng for their financial support (National Natural Science Foundation of China: 82072788 to YG, 82203390 to LYH, 82203204 to JJD) and insightful discussions throughout the course of this study.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82203390 to LYH, 82072788 to YG and 82203204 to JJD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LHR provided the design concept of this study, LHR, JJD and LYH drafted the manuscript. LHR, JJD and QX collected, processed and analyzed the data. LHR completed the drawing of the figures. HW, YG and LYH completed the revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to this article and read and approved the final manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study used publicly available datasets and the ethics approval and consent to participate was not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, L., Deng, J., Wakimoto, H. et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics and long-term outcomes of pediatric intracranial meningiomas: a comprehensive analysis from a single neurosurgical center. acta neuropathol commun 13, 15 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40478-025-01925-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40478-025-01925-0