Skip to main content
  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open access
  • Published:

Non-supratentorial YAP1- fused ependymomas: report of two cases

Ependymoma is a heterogeneous group of central nervous system tumors [1]. Over the past decade, molecular profiling advancements have enabled the classification of ependymomas into at least ten subtypes, based on anatomical sites (supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal cord) and molecular alterations [2]. Supratentorial ependymomas (ST-EPNs) are primarily characterized by two types of fusion variations involving the zinc finger translocation-associated gene (ZFTA) and Yes1-Associated Transcriptional regulator (YAP1) [2]. ZFTA fusion occurs in approximately 66–84% of pediatric ST-EPNs and generally indicates a poor prognosis. In contrast, YAP1 fusion is relatively rare (6–7% of pediatric cases) and usually suggests a more indolent biological behavior. Recently, it has been noted that ZFTA- or YAP1-fusion-positive ependymomas can also occur in the posterior fossa (PF) or spinal cord (SP) [1, 3]. Here, we report two cases of non-supratentorial YAP1-fused ependymomas (one cerebellar and one intramedullary) and comprehensively investigate their histopathological and molecular characteristics, as well as prognosis, to provide detailed insights into these rare cases.

Case #1: An 18-month-old boy had been walking unsteadily for one month and experienced persistent vomiting for four days. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a lesion in the cerebellum with contrast enhancement (Fig. 1A). Histopathological examination showed conventional histology of ependymoma (WHO grade 3) with high cellularity, perivascular pseudorosettes, abundant mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation and necrosis (Fig. 1B). Some tumor areas demonstrated a dense proliferation of spindle cells with mesenchymal differentiation. Spindle cells have moderate atypia and rare mitotic figures. (Figure 1C and D). The reticulin histochemistry showed widespread background collagen and pericellular reticulin. Case #2: A 51-year-old woman lost temperature sensation below her right rib twenty years ago, but she did not exhibit any obvious physical or limb activity disorders at that time. She received traditional Chinese medicine and local rehabilitation treatment, which led to a gradual subsiding of her loss of temperature sensation. While she developed bilateral numbness in the upper extremities nineteen days ago. Spine MRI revealed an intramedullary space-occupying lesion at the C7 to T1 level (Fig. 1I). Histopathological examination revealed a moderately cellularity, well-circumscribed proliferation with ependymal differentiation (WHO grade 2) (Fig. 1J). The nuclei were round to ovoid with prominent nucleoli. The cytoplasm was granular and eosinophilic, along with numerous hyaline degenerations of the vessel walls (Fig. 1K and L). Mitotic figures were infrequent, and no necrosis or microvascular proliferation was observed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

In case #1, MRI on the T1 sequence shows a mass in the cerebellum with contrast enhancement (A). H&E staining shows an anaplastic ependymal features with necrosis (B), prominent proliferation of spindle cells (C) and mesenchymal differentiation (D). GFAP is diffusely positive in the tumor cells (E). EMA is expressed with a diffuse paranuclear dot-like immunoexpression (F). Olig2 is negative (G). Ki-67 labeling index is high (30%) (H). In case #2: T1-weighted MRI of the spine shows an intramedullary space-occupying lesion at the level of C7 to T1 with contrast enhancement (I). H&E staining shows ependymal features, moderately cellularity (J), abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm (K), and numerous hyaline degenerations of the vessel walls (L). GFAP is positive (M). EMA is expressed with a paranuclear dot-like immunoexpression (N). Olig2 is negative (O). Ki-67 labeling index is low (2%) (P)

Immunohistochemistry showed GFAP positivity (Fig. 1E, M) and a diffuse paranuclear dot-like pattern of EMA staining in both cases (Fig. 1F, N). The immunoreactivity test was negative for Olig2 (Fig. 1G, O), p65, L1CAM, H3K27M, and EZHIP. Tumors have retained H3K27me3 and ATRX nuclear expression in both cases. The Ki-67 labeling index was found to be 30% in case #1 and 2% in case #2, respectively (Fig. 1H, P). RNA sequencing revealed that case #1 harbored a YAP1-MAML2 fusion (Fig. 2A), while case #2 had a YAP1-FAM118B fusion (Fig. 2B).YAP1 rearrangements were also identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in both cases (Fig. 2C and D). Additionally, DNA methylation analysis was performed using the Infinium Methylation EPIC 935 K BeadChip array (Illumina, San Diego, USA), based on version 11b4 of the Heidelberg brain tumor classifier. Case #1 clustered with YAP1-positive supratentorial ependymoma (calibrated score: 0.99), and case #2 clustered with spinal cord ependymoma (calibrated score: 0.45) (Fig. 2E). No evidence supported primary ST tumors metastasizing to infratentorial or spinal cord locations. For case #1, The final diagnosis was PF-EPN-YAP1-MAML2 fusion-positive, WHO grade 3. Gross total resection followed by focal radiation therapy was performed. However, the tumor locally recurred after four months. For case #2, The final diagnosis was SP-EPN-YAP1-FAM118B fusion-positive, WHO grade 2. Gross total resection was performed without adjuvant treatment, and the patient remained recurrence-free at the six-month follow-up.

Fig. 2
figure 2

RNA-NGS shows the YAP1-MAML2 fusion in case #1 (A) and YAP1-FAM118B fusion in case #2 (B). Rearrangement of YAP1 is detected by FISH in case #1 (C) and case #2 (D). DNA methylome profiling and t-SNE analysis (E)

As a rare molecular subtype, YAP1-fused EPNs generally indicate a better prognosis. They primarily occur in the supratentorial regions and predominantly affect females (female-to-male ratio of 2.75), especially children under two years old (median age of 1.4 years) [4]. Although YAP1-fused PF- and SP-EPNs have been reported [1, 5], it remains unclear whether they represent a distinct subset of ependymomas or are closely related to YAP1-fused ST-EPNs. Based on the aforementioned results, we propose that the pathological features and prognosis of YAP1-fused infratentorial ependymomas are not entirely identical to those of YAP1-fused ST-EPNs.

In case #1, the YAP1-MAML2 fusion ependymoma, occurred in a child, was located in the cerebellum and exhibited anaplastic features of ependymoma with mesenchymal differentiation. Although DNA methylation analysis clustered the tumor with ST-EPN-YAP1, which generally suggests an improved prognosis, the tumor recurred four months after gross total resection. In case #2, the tumor with a YAP1-FAM118B fusion in the spinal cord was morphologically classified as a grade 2 ependymoma with granular and eosinophilic cytoplasmic cells and notable hyaline degeneration of the vascular wall. The methylation profiling clustered it with the SP-EPN group, albeit with a calibrated score of only 0.45, indicating that further analysis is required for definitive classification. This case involves a 51-year-old woman with a YAP1 -fused ependymoma, which is extremely rare in the spinal cord. For 20 years, she had lost temperature sensation below the level of her right rib. Because there are no MRI results from this period, we can only infer that the prolonged duration of her symptoms suggests the tumor’s very indolent behavior. We are still actively monitoring the patient’s prognosis.

The YAP1 gene encodes the Yap1 protein, a downstream effector of the Hippo tumor suppressor pathway that regulates transcription through the transcriptional enhanced associate domain (TEAD) [6]. Its fusion partners include MAMLD1, FAM118B, MAML2, TFE3, SS18, and ZFTA [7]. Among these, YAP1-MAMLD1 is the most common fusion in YAP1-fused ST-EPN, while YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-FAM118B fusions are extremely rare [5, 8,9,10]. In summary, this report provides detailed information on YAP1-fused non-ST-EPNs and suggests that this subtype may differ from conventional YAP1-fused ST-EPNs. Further studies are needed to understand the biological functions of YAP1 fusion in the oncogenic and developmental processes of ependymomas at different anatomical sites.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Lim KY, Lee KH, Phi JH, Yun H, Won JK, Choi SH et al (2022) ZFTA-YAP1 fusion-positive ependymoma can occur in the spinal cord: letter to the editor. Brain Pathol 32(1):e13020. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/bpa.13020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23(8):1231–1251. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/neuonc/noab106

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keenan C, Graham RT, Harreld JH, Lucas JJ, Finkelstein D, Wheeler D et al (2020) Infratentorial C11orf95-fused gliomas share histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of supratentorial RELA-fused ependymoma. Acta Neuropathol 140(6):963–965. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00401-020-02238-3

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kresbach C, Neyazi S, Schuller U (2022) Updates in the classification of ependymal neoplasms: the 2021 WHO classification and beyond. Brain Pathol 32(4):e13068. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/bpa.13068

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pajtler KW, Witt H, Sill M, Jones DT, Hovestadt V, Kratochwil F et al (2015) Molecular classification of Ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and Age groups. Cancer Cell 27(5):728–743. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pajtler KW, Wei Y, Okonechnikov K, Silva P, Vouri M, Zhang L et al (2019) YAP1 subgroup supratentorial ependymoma requires TEAD and nuclear factor I-mediated transcriptional programmes for tumorigenesis. Nat Commun 10(1):3914. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41467-019-11884-5

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szulzewsky F, Arora S, Hoellerbauer P, King C, Nathan E, Chan M et al (2020) Comparison of tumor-associated YAP1 fusions identifies a recurrent set of functions critical for oncogenesis. Genes Dev 34(15–16):1051–1064. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gad.338681.120

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tauziede-Espariat A, Siegfried A, Nicaise Y, Figarella-Branger D, Appay R, Senova S et al (2022) A novel YAP1-MAML2 fusion in an adult supra-tentorial ependymoma, YAP1-fused. Brain Tumor Pathol 39(4):240–242. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10014-022-00439-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J, Wang L, Fu L, Li QC, Qiu XS, Wang EH et al (2021) Supratentorial ependymoma with YAP1:FAM118B fusion: a case report. Neuropathology 41(2):133–138. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/neup.12712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamai S, Nakano Y, Kinoshita M, Sabit H, Nobusawa S, Arai Y et al (2021) Ependymoma with C11orf95-MAML2 fusion: presenting with granular cell and ganglion cell features. Brain Tumor Pathol 38(1):64–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10014-020-00388-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Yaping Xu from Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Digital Medical Diagnostic Technology for his technical assistance. We would also like to thank the patients and family members who gave their consent on presenting the data in this study, as well as the investigators and research staff involved in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Nova program (Z201100006820149) and Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding (ZYLX202113).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Leiming Wang, Lei Cheng, Yongjuan Fu, Yanlei Xiong and Hua Dong. Dehong Lu, Yueshan Piao and Lianghong Teng reviewed the pathological diagnosis. Leiming Wang, Yueshan Piao and Lianghong Teng involved in conception, supervision, and design of all manuscripts. The draft of the manuscript was written by Leiming Wang, Yueshan Piao and Lianghong Teng. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leiming Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The research involving experiments on human subjects met the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration, and was approved by the ethics committee of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University.

Consent for publication

Consent was obtained from the involved subject for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Cheng, L., Fu, Y. et al. Non-supratentorial YAP1- fused ependymomas: report of two cases. acta neuropathol commun 12, 158 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40478-024-01862-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40478-024-01862-4

Keywords